Distributed Management Task Force, Inc.

Specification for CIM Operations over HTTP

Version 1.0

August  11th, 1999

Participants

This list shows the names of the companies and organizations that have participated in the Distributed Management Task Force - CIM TC XML Sub-Committee whose contributions made this document possible.

  • Agranat Systems
  • Hewlett-Packard Company
  • IBM Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Tivoli Systems, Inc.
  • Customer Support Consortium
  • Sun Microsystems, Inc.
  • Intel Corporation

Change History

Version 1.0a May 1st, 1999 First Draft Release
Version 1.0b May 7th, 1999 Updates after first Working Group Review
Version 1.0c May 11th, 1999 Further updates
Version 1.0d May 25th, 1999 Changed LOCAL to PROPAGATED
Added VALUETYPE attribute to KEYVALUE
Version 1.0e May 28th, 1999

AssociationTraversal dependent on BasicRead. not BasicWrite

CIMFunctionalGroups OPTIONS header renamed to CIMSupportedFunctionalGroups

501 returned by server if it does not support multiple requests and receives such a request

Added some operation parameters and allowed them to take default values

Version 1.0 June 2nd, 1999

Clarified meaning of default intrinsic parameter value
Resolved ambiguity over server response to protocol version that is not supported
Clarified use of property list in Associators and References intrinsic methods

July 6th, 1999

Updated examples to reflect DTD changes
QueryExecution based on BasicRead, not BasicWrite

July 20th, 1999

Remove IncludeClassOrigin and IncludeQualifiers parameters from ExecQuery.
Parameters to Associators, AssocitorNames, References and ReferenceNames which express class names are modelled as <className> rather than string.
NewValue parameter to SetProperty is now OPTIONAL
Clarified semantics of optional parameters, and the distinction between a default parameter value and a NULL parameter value.
Clarified Create and Modify operational semantics.
Clarified validation requirements and introduced CIMValidation header for OPTIONS response.
Introduced CIMError response header to disambiguate fundamental CIM-specific errors that map to the same HTTP status code.

Contents

Abstract
1. Introduction

1.1. Requirements
1.2. Terminology
1.3. Style
2. CIM Operation Syntax and Semantics
2.1. Overview
2.1.1. Well-Formed, Valid and Loosely Valid
2.2. Operational Semantics
2.3. Method Invocations
2.3.1. Simple Operations
2.3.2. Multiple Operations 
2.3.3. Status Codes
2.4. Intrinsic Methods
2.4.1. GetClass
2.4.2. GetInstance
2.4.3. DeleteClass
2.4.4. DeleteInstance
2.4.5. CreateClass
2.4.6. CreateInstance
2.4.7. ModifyClass
2.4.8. ModifyInstance 
2.4.9. EnumerateClasses
2.4.10. EnumerateClassNames
2.4.11. EnumerateInstances
2.4.12. EnumerateInstanceNames
2.4.13. ExecQuery 
2.4.14. Associators
2.4.15. AssociatorNames
2.4.16. References
2.4.17. ReferenceNames 
2.4.18. GetProperty
2.4.19. SetProperty
2.4.20. GetQualifier 
2.4.21. SetQualifier
2.4.22. DeleteQualifier
2.4.23. EnumerateQualifiers
2.5. Namespace Manipulation
2.6. Functional Profiles
2.7. Extrinsic Method Invocation
3. Encapsulation of CIM Operations
3.1. CIM Clients and Servers
3.2. Use of M-POST and POST
3.2.1. Use of the Ext Header
3.3. Extension Headers Defined for CIM Operation Requests and Responses
3.3.1. Naming of Extension Headers
3.3.2. Encoding of CIM Names within HTTP Headers
3.3.3. Encoding of CIM Object Paths within HTTP Headers
3.3.4. CIMOperation
3.3.5. CIMProtocolVersion
3.3.6. CIMMethod
3.3.7. CIMObject
3.3.8. CIMBatch
3.3.9. CIMError 
4. HTTP Requirements & Usage
4.1. HTTP Support
4.2. Use of Standard Headers
4.2.1. Accept
4.2.2. Accept-Charset
4.2.3. Accept-Encoding
4.2.4. Accept-Language
4.2.5. Accept-Ranges
4.2.6. Allow
4.2.7. Authorization
4.2.8. Cache-Control
4.2.9. Connection
4.2.10. Content-Encoding
4.2.11. Content-Language
4.2.12. Content-Range
4.2.13. Content-Type
4.2.14. Expires
4.2.15. If-Range
4.2.16. Proxy-Authenticate
4.2.17. Range
4.2.18. WWW-Authenticate
4.3. Errors and Status Codes
4.4. Security Considerations
4.5. Determining CIM Server Capabilities
4.5.1. CIMSupportedFunctionalGroups
4.5.2. CIMSupportsMultipleOperations
4.5.3. CIMSupportedQueryLanguages
4.5.4. CIMValidation
4.6. Other HTTP Methods
4.7. Discovery and Addressing
4.8. Internationalization Considerations
5. References
Appendix A - Examples of Message Exchanges
A.1. Retrieval of a Single Class Definition
A.2. Retrieval of a Single Instance Definition
A.3. Deletion of a Single Class Definition
A.4. Deletion of a Single Instance Definition
A.5. Creation of a Single Class Definition
A.6. Creation of a Single Instance Definition
A.7. Enumeration of Class Names
A.8. Enumeration of Instances
A.9. Retrieval of a Single Property
A.10. Execution of an Extrinsic Method 

Abstract

The Common Information Model (CIM) [1] is an object-oriented information model defined by the Distributed Management Task Force (DMTF) which provides a conceptual framework for describing management data.

The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) [6,7,10] is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information systems.  It is a generic stateless protocol which can be used for many tasks through extension  of its request methods, error codes and headers.

The Extensible Markup Language (XML) [3] is a simplified subset of SGML that offers powerful and extensible data modeling capabilities. An XML Document is a collection of data represented in XML. An XML Schema is a grammar that describes the structure of an XML Document.

This document defines a mapping of CIM Operations onto HTTP that allows implementations of CIM to interoperate in an open, standardized manner.  It utilizes the CIM XML DTD [2,11] that defines the XML Schema for CIM objects and messages.

Back to contents

1. Introduction

This document defines a mapping of CIM operations onto HTTP that allows implementations of CIM to operate in an open, standardized manner. It also defines the notion of conformance in the context of this mapping, and describes what behavior an implementation of CIM must exhibit in order to be described as a conforming CIM implementation.

The remainder of this document is structured as follows.

Back to contents

1.1. Requirements

There are potentially many different ways in which CIM operations could be represented within XML, and those operations encapsulated within HTTP messages. In the interests of interoperability between different implementations of CIM there is an obvious requirement for standardization of both the XML representation and the HTTP encapsulation. The XML representation is defined in [2,11].  This document utilizes that representation to defines the HTTP encapsulation.

The following criteria have been applied to the representation of CIM Operations in XML [2,11]:

The following criteria have been applied to the HTTP encapsulation of CIM Operations herein:

Back to contents

1.2. Terminology

The key phrases and words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY and OPTIONAL in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [8].

This specification uses the same notational conventions and basic parsing constructs as defined in [7].

Back to contents

1.3. Style

This document uses a number of stylistic conventions to highlight examples and definitions.

Examples are displayed in this fashion:

This is an example

Definitions are illustrated thusly:

This is a definition

Back to contents

2. CIM Operation Syntax and Semantics

2.1. Overview

This specification defines all interactions between CIM entities as Operations.  CIM Operations belong to a larger category known as CIM Messages (currently all Messages are Operations, but in future this may not be true).

This section describes the syntax and semantics of CIM Operations in a manner independent of the encapsulation of such operations within a particular protocol (such as HTTP).

XML is used as the basis for this description, and in particular the CIM XML DTD [2,11].

Back to contents

2.1.1. Well-Formed, Valid and Loosely Valid

Where this document makes reference to the concept of a Well-formed or Valid XML documents, the meaning intended is the standard one defined in [3].

XML DTDs are restricted to these terms to describe XML documents, but this document requires a further classification of an XML document with respect to a DTD. Henceforth the term loosely valid is defined to apply to an XML Document with the following characteristics:

In effect, a loosely valid document is one which is valid with respect to the CIM XML DTD apart from having additional attributes or elements not defined by that DTD. The concept is very similar to that of an open content model as defined by the working draft on XML Schemas [21], expressed within the more limited scope of DTDs. One corollary of this definition is that any XML document that is valid with respect to the CIM XML DTD is also loosely valid.

The motivation for introducing this class of XML Documents is to relax the restrictions on a CIM Client or a CIM Server when parsing received XML documents defined within the scope of this mapping. It is recognized that not all Clients (respectively, Servers) should be required to validate each received Operation Response Message (respectively, Operation Request Message) as this would place too great a processing burden on the validating entity at the expense of footprint and performance, most notably in communication between robust and conformant implementations of this mapping.

Instead the following requirements are made by this specification:

The behavior of a CIM Server with respect to a received Operation Request Message is covered in detail in the section on Errors and Status Codes .

2.2. Operational Semantics

The CIM XML DTD [2,11] defines a subelement under the root <CIM> element called <MESSAGE>, which contains one of the following subelements:

In the remainder of this document:

An Operation Request Message MUST contain a non-empty value for the ID attribute of the <MESSAGE> element.  The corresponding Operation Response Message MUST supply the same value for that attribute.  Clients SHOULD employ a message ID scheme that minimizes the chance of receiving a stale Operation Response Message.

Any Operation Request Message or Operation Response Message conforming to this specification MUST specify a value of "1.0" for the PROTOCOLVERSION attribute of the <MESSAGE> element.

An Operation Response Message sent in response to an Operation Request Message MUST:

A Simple Operation Request is an Operation Request Message that contains a <SIMPLEREQ> subelement.  A Simple Operation Response is an Operation Response Message that contains a <SIMPLERSP> subelement.

A Multiple Operation Request is an Operation Request Message that contains a <MULTIREQ> subelement.  A Multiple Operation Response is an Operation Response Message that contains a <MULTIRSP> subelement.

Back to contents

2.3. Method Invocations

All CIM Operation requests defined for this mapping are defined as invocations of one or more methods.  A method may be either:

Intrinsic methods are further characterized by the fact that they are made against a CIM Namespace.  Extrinsic methods are invoked on a CIM Class (if static) or Instance (otherwise). Intrinsic methods are defined in the section Intrinsic Methods

An extrinsic method call is represented in XML by the <METHODCALL> element, and the response to that call represented by the <METHODRESPONSE> element. 

An intrinsic method call is represented in XML by the <IMETHODCALL> element, and the response to that call represented by the <IMETHODRESPONSE> element.

An Input parameter is one with an IN Qualifier (with value true) in the Method definition.  An Output parameter is one with an OUT Qualifier (with value true) in the Method definition.  An Optional parameter is one with an OPTIONAL Qualifier in the Method definition. A parameter may be both an Input and Output parameter.

The <METHODCALL> or <IMETHODCALL> element serves to name the method to be invoked and supply any Input parameters to the method call. Note that:

The <METHODRESPONSE> or <IMETHODRESPONSE> element defines either an <ERROR> or a (possibly optional) return value and output parameters (i.e. one decorated with the OUT Qualifier in the method definition).  In the latter case:

The method invocation process may be thought of as:

Back to contents

2.3.1. Simple Operations

A simple operation is defined as one that requires the invocation of a single method.  A simple operation request is represented by a <SIMPLEREQ> element, and a simple operation response by a <SIMPLERSP> element.

If the method is intrinsic then the <SIMPLEREQ> MUST contain a <IMETHODCALL> element, which in turn contains a <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH> subelement identifying the local CIM Namespace against which the method is to be executed.  If the method is extrinsic then the <SIMPLEREQ> element MUST contain a <METHODCALL> element which in turn contains either:

Back to contents

2.3.2. Multiple Operations

A multiple operation is defined as one that requires the invocation of more than one method.  A multiple operation request is represented by a <MULTIREQ> element, and a multiple operation response by a <MULTIRSP> element.

A <MULTIREQ> (respectively, <MULTIRSP>) element is a sequence of two or more <SIMPLEREQ> (respectively, <SIMPLERSP>) elements. 

A <MULTIRSP> element MUST contain a <SIMPLERSP> element for every <SIMPLEREQ> element in the corresponding Multiple Operation Response, and these <SIMPLERSP> elements MUST be in the same order as their <SIMPLEREQ> counterparts (so the first <SIMPLERSP> in the response corresponds to the first <SIMPLEREQ> in the request, and so forth).

Multiple Operations provide a convenient mechanism whereby multiple method invocations may be batched into a single HTTP Message, thereby reducing the number of roundtrips between a CIM Client and a CIM Server and allowing the CIM Server to make certain internal optimizations should it choose so to do.  Note that Multiple Operations do not confer any transactional capabilities in the processing of the request (for example, there is no requirement that the CIM Server guarantee that the constituent method calls either all failed or all succeeded, only that the entity make a "best effort" to process the operation).

Not all CIM Servers support Multiple Operations; the means by which they declare support for this feature is defined in the section on Determining CIM Server Capabilities.

Back to contents

2.3.3. Status Codes

This section defines the status codes that may be returned by a conforming CIM Server application as the value of the CODE attribute of an <ERROR> subelement within a <METHODRESPONSE> or <IMETHODRESPONSE> element.

The symbolic names defined in the table below do not appear on the wire.  They are used here solely as a convenient way to refer to an error in other parts of this specification.

Not all methods would be expected to return all the status codes listed below.  For intrinsic methods, the relevant section on each method in this specification defines the expected error codes to be returned.  For extrinsic methods the specification of which of the following codes can be used is described in the section on Extrinsic Method Invocation .

Symbolic Name

CODE

Definition

CIM_ERR_FAILED 1 A general error occured that is not covered by a more specific error code
CIM_ERR_ACCESS_DENIED 2 Access to a CIM resource was not available to the client
CIM_ERR_INVALID_NAMESPACE 3 The target namespace does not exist
CIM_ERR_INVALID_PARAMETER 4 One or more parameter values passed to the method were invalid
CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS 5 The specified Class does not exist
CIM_ERR_NOT_FOUND 6 The requested object could not be found
CIM_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED 7 The requested operation is not supported
CIM_ERR_CLASS_HAS_CHILDREN 8 Operation cannot be carried out on this class since it has subclasses
CIM_ERR_CLASS_HAS_INSTANCES 9 Operation cannot be carried out on this class since it has instances
CIM_ERR_INVALID_SUPERCLASS 10 Operation cannot be carried out since the specified superclass does not exist
CIM_ERR_ALREADY_EXISTS 11 Operation cannot be carried out because an object already exists
CIM_ERR_NO_SUCH_PROPERTY 12 The specified Property does not exist
CIM_ERR_TYPE_MISMATCH 13 The value supplied is incompatible with the type
CIM_ERR_QUERY_LANGUAGE_NOT_SUPPORTED 14 The query language is not recognized or supported
CIM_ERR_INVALID_QUERY 15 The query is not valid for the specified query language
CIM_ERR_METHOD_NOT_AVAILABLE 16 The extrinsic Method could not be executed
CIM_ERR_METHOD_NOT_FOUND 17 The specified extrinsic Method does not exist

Back to contents

2.4. Intrinsic Methods

This section describes the Intrinsic methods that are defined outside of schema for the purposes of CIM operations.  These methods can only be called on a CIM Namespace, rather than a CIM Class or CIM Instance.

The following intrinsic methods are defined by this specification:

The convention used in the following subsections to define the signatures of the intrinsic methods is a pseudo-MOF notation that extends the standard MOF BNF [1] for describing CIM Methods with a number of pseudo parameter types (which are indicated by being placed within "<" and ">" characters).

This notation admits of the decoration of parameters with a number of pseudo-qualifiers (IN, OPTIONAL and NULL) to define their invocation semantics. It is important to understand that these qualifiers are used for descriptional purposes only within the scope of this specification, and in particular a CIM Client MUST NOT specify them in intrinsic method invocations.

This notation uses the IN qualifier to denote that the parameter is an input parameter.

This notation uses the OPTIONAL qualifier to indicate paramaters whose presence is not mandatory, and declares default values for optional method parameters using similar notation employed for default property values in MOF.

A CIM Client MAY omit an optional parameter in the case that the required value is the specified default, by not specifying an <IPARAMVALUE> element for that parameter. It MUST NOT omit any parameter that is not marked as optional.

This notation uses the NULL qualifier to indicate parameters whose values may be be specified as NULL in a method call. A NULL (unassigned) value for a parameter is specified by an <IPARAMVALUE> element with no subelement. For parameters which do not possess the NULL qualifier, the CIM Client MUST specify a value for the parameter by including a suitable subelement for the <IPARAMVALUE> element for that parameter.

All parameters MUST be named uniquely, and MUST correspond to a valid parameter name for that method as described by this specification. The order of the parameters is not significant.

The non-NULL values of intrinsic method parameters or return values which are modelled as standard CIM types (such as string and boolean, or arrays thereof) are represented as follows:

The following table describes how each of the pseudo-types used by the intrinsic methods MUST be mapped to an XML element described in [2] in the context of both a parameter value (subelement of <IPARAMVALUE>) and a return value (subelement of <IRETURNVALUE>).

Type

XML Element

<object> (VALUE.OBJECT|VALUE.OBJECTWITHLOCALPATH|VALUE.OBJECTWITHPATH)
<class> CLASS
<instance> INSTANCE
<className> CLASSNAME
<namedInstance> VALUE.NAMEDINSTANCE
<instanceName> INSTANCENAME
<objectWithPath>

VALUE.OBJECTWITHPATH

<objectName> (CLASSNAME|INSTANCENAME)
<propertyValue> (VALUE|VALUE.ARRAY|VALUE.REFERENCE)
<qualifierDecl> QUALIFIER.DECLARATION

Back to contents

2.4.1. GetClass

This operation is used to return a single CIM Class from the target Namespace. 

 GetClass
 <class>  GetClass (
         [IN] <className> ClassName,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean LocalOnly = true,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeQualifiers = true,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeClassOrigin = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string PropertyList [] = NULL
 )

The ClassName input parameter defines the name of the Class to be retrieved. 

If the LocalOnly input parameter is true, this specifies that only CIM Elements (properties, methods and qualifiers) overriden within the definition of the Class are returned [1].  If false, all elements are returned.  This parameter therefore effects a CIM Server-side mechanism to filter certain elements of the returned object based on whether or not they have been propagated from the parent Class (as defined by the PROPAGATED attribute).

If the IncludeQualifiers input parameter is true, this specifies that all Qualifiers for that Class (including Qualifiers on the Class and on any returned Properties, Methods or Method Parameters) MUST be included as <QUALIFIER> elements in the response.  If false no <QUALIFIER> elements are present in the returned Class.

If the IncludeClassOrigin input parameter is true, this specifies that the CLASSORIGIN attribute MUST be present on all appropriate elements in the returned Class. If false, no CLASSORIGIN attributes are present in the returned Class.

If the PropertyList input parameter is not NULL, the members of the array define one or more Property names.  The returned Class MUST NOT include elements for any Properties missing from this list.  Note that if LocalOnly is specified as true this acts as an additional filter on the set of Properties returned (for example, if Property A is included in the PropertyList but LocalOnly is set to true and A is not local to the requested Class, then it will not be included in the response). If the PropertyList input parameter is an empty array this signifies that no Properties are included in the response. If the PropertyList input parameter is NULL this specifies that all Properties (subject to the conditions expressed by the other parameters) are included in the response.

If the PropertyList contains duplicate elements, the Server MUST ignore the duplicates but otherwise process the request normally.  If the PropertyList contains elements which are invalid Property names for the target Class, the Server MUST ignore such entries but otherwise process the request normally.

If successful, the return value is a single CIM Class.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.2. GetInstance

This operation is used to return a single CIM Instance from the target Namespace. 

 GetInstance
 <instance> GetInstance (
         [IN] <instanceName> InstanceName,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean LocalOnly = true,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeQualifiers = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeClassOrigin = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string PropertyList [] = NULL
 )

The InstanceName input parameter defines the name of the Instance to be retrieved. 

If the LocalOnly input parameter is true, this specifies that only elements (properties and qualifiers) overriden within the definition of the Instance are returned [1].  If false, all elements are returned.  This parameter therefore effects a CIM Server-side mechanism to filter certain elements of the returned object based on whether or not they have been propagated from the parent Class (as defined by the PROPAGATED attribute).

If the IncludeQualifiers input parameter is true, this specifies that all Qualifiers for that Instance (including Qualifiers on the Instance and on any returned Properties) MUST be included as <QUALIFIER> elements in the response.  If false no <QUALIFIER> elements are present in the returned Instance.

If the IncludeClassOrigin input parameter is true, this specifies that the CLASSORIGIN attribute MUST be present on all appropriate elements in the returned Instance. If false, no CLASSORIGIN attributes are present in the returned Instance.

If the PropertyList input parameter is not NULL, the members of the array define one or more Property names.  The returned Instance MUST NOT include elements for any Properties missing from this list.  Note that if LocalOnly is specified as true this acts as an additional filter on the set of Properties returned (for example, if Property A is included in the PropertyList but LocalOnly is set to true and A is not local to the requested Instance, then it will not be included in the response). If the PropertyList input parameter is an empty array this signifies that no Properties are included in the response. If the PropertyList input parameter is NULL this specifies that all Properties (subject to the conditions expressed by the other parameters) are included in the response.

If the PropertyList contains duplicate elements, the Server MUST ignore the duplicates but otherwise process the request normally.  If the PropertyList contains elements which are invalid Property names for the target Instance, the Server MUST ignore such entries but otherwise process the request normally.

If successful, the return value is a single CIM Instance.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.3. DeleteClass

This operation is used to delete a single CIM Class from the target Namespace.

 DeleteClass
 void  DeleteClass (
        [IN] <className> ClassName
 )

The ClassName input parameter defines the name of the Class to be deleted.   

If successful, the specified Class (including any subclasses and any instances) MUST have been removed by the CIM Server.  The operation MUST fail if any one of these objects cannot be deleted.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.4. DeleteInstance

This operation is used to delete a single CIM Instance from the target Namespace. 

 DeleteInstance
 void  DeleteInstance (
         [IN] <instanceName> InstanceName
 )

The InstanceName input parameter defines the name (model path) of the Instance to be deleted. 

If successful, the specified Instance MUST have been removed by the CIM Server.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.5. CreateClass

This operation is used to create a single CIM Class in the target Namespace.  The Class MUST NOT already exist.

 CreateClass
 void CreateClass (
        [IN] <class> NewClass
 )

The NewClass input parameter defines the new Class.  The proposed definition MUST be a correct Class definition according to the CIM specification [1].

In processing the creation of the new Class, the following rules MUST be conformed to by the CIM Server:

If successful, the specified Class MUST have been created by the CIM Server. 

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.6. CreateInstance

This operation is used to create a single CIM Instance in the target Namespace. The Instance MUST NOT already exist.

 CreateInstance
 <instanceName>  CreateInstance (
        [IN] <instance> NewInstance
 )

The NewInstance input parameter defines the new Instance.  The proposed definition MUST be a correct Instance definition for the underlying CIM Class according to the CIM specification [1].

In processing the creation of the new Instance, the following rules MUST be conformed to by the CIM Server:

If successful, the return value defines the object path of the new CIM Instance relative to the target Namespace (i.e. the Model Path as defined by [1]), created by the CIM Server.  It is returned in case one or more of the new keys of the Instance are allocated dynamically during the creation process rather than specified in the request.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.7. ModifyClass

This operation is used to modify an existing CIM Class in the target Namespace.  The Class MUST already exist.

 ModifyClass
 void ModifyClass (
        [IN] <class> ModifiedClass
 )

The ModifiedClass input parameter defines the set of changes (which MUST be correct amendments to the CIM Class as defined by the CIM Specification [1]) to be made to the current class definition.

In processing the modifcation of the Class, the following rules MUST be conformed to by the CIM Server:

If successful, the specified Class MUST have been updated by the CIM Server. 

The request to modify the Class MUST fail if the Server cannot update any existing Subclasses or Instances of that Class in a consistent manner.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.8. ModifyInstance

This operation is used to modify an existing CIM Instance in the target Namespace. The Instance MUST already exist.

 ModifyInstance
 void ModifyInstance (
        [IN] <namedInstance> ModifiedInstance
 )

The ModifiedInstance input parameter identifies the name of the Instance to be modified, and defines the set of changes (which MUST be correct amendments to the Instance as defined by the CIM Specification [1]) to be made to the current Instance definition. 

In processing the modifcation of the Instance, the following rules MUST be conformed to by the CIM Server:

If successful, the specified Instance MUST have been updated by the CIM Server. 

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.9. EnumerateClasses

This operation is used to enumerate subclasses of a CIM Class in the target Namespace.

 EnumerateClasses
 <class>* EnumerateClasses (
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <className> ClassName=NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean DeepInheritance = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean LocalOnly = true,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeQualifiers = true,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeClassOrigin = false
 )

The ClassName input parameter defines the Class that is the basis for the enumeration. 

If the DeepInheritance input parameter is true, this specifies that all subclasses of the specified Class should be returned (if the ClassName input parameter is absent, this implies that all Classes in the target Namespace should be returned).  If false, only immediate child subclasses are returned (if the ClassName input parameter is NULL, this implies that all base Classes in the target Namespace should be returned).

If the LocalOnly input parameter is true, it specifies that, for each returned Class, only elements (properties, methods and qualifiers) overriden within the definition of that Class are included [1].  If false, all elements are returned.  This parameter therefore effects a CIM Server-side mechanism to filter certain elements of the returned object based on whether or not they have been propagated from the parent Class (as defined by the PROPAGATED attribute).

If the IncludeQualifiers input parameter is true, this specifies that all Qualifiers for each Class (including Qualifiers on the Class and on any returned Properties, Methods or Method Parameters) MUST be included as <QUALIFIER> elements in the response.  If false no <QUALIFIER> elements are present in each returned Class.

If the IncludeClassOrigin input parameter is true, this specifies that the CLASSORIGIN attribute MUST be present on all appropriate elements in each returned Class. If false, no CLASSORIGIN attributes are present in each returned Class.

If successful, the method returns zero or more Classes that meet the required criteria.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.10. EnumerateClassNames

This operation is used to enumerate the names of subclasses of a CIM Class in the target Namespace.

 EnumerateClassNames
 <className>*  EnumerateClassNames (
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <className> ClassName = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean DeepInheritance = false
 )

The ClassName input parameter defines the Class that is the basis for the enumeration.   

If the DeepInheritance input parameter is true, this specifies that the names of all subclasses of the specified Class should be returned (if the ClassName input parameter is absent, this implies that the names of all Classes in the target Namespace should be returned).  If false, only the names of immediate child subclasses are returned (if the ClassName input parameter is NULL, this implies that the names of all base Classes in the target Namespace should be returned).

If successful, the method returns zero or more names of Classes that meet the requested criteria.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.11. EnumerateInstances

This operation is used to enumerate instances of a CIM Class in the target Namespace.

 EnumerateInstances
 <namedInstance>* EnumerateInstances (
         [IN] <className> ClassName,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean LocalOnly = true,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean DeepInheritance = true,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeQualifiers = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeClassOrigin = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string PropertyList [] = NULL
 )

The ClassName input parameter defines the Class that is the basis for the enumeration.   

If the LocalOnly input parameter is true, this specifies that, for each returned Instance, only elements (properties and qualifiers) overriden within the definition of that Instance are included [1].  If false, all elements are returned.  This parameter therefore effects a CIM Server-side mechanism to filter certain elements of the returned object based on whether or not they have been propagated from the parent Class (as defined by the PROPAGATED attribute).

If the DeepInheritance input parameter is true, this specifies that, for each returned Instance of the Class, all properties of the Instance MUST be present (subject to constraints imposed by the other parameters), including any which were added by subclassing the specified Class. If false, each returned Instance includes only properties defined for the specified Class.

If the IncludeQualifiers input parameter is true, this specifies that all Qualifiers for each Instance (including Qualifiers on the Instance and on any returned Properties) MUST be included as <QUALIFIER> elements in the response.  If false no <QUALIFIER> elements are present in each returned Instance.

If the IncludeClassOrigin input parameter is true, this specifies that the CLASSORIGIN attribute MUST be present on all appropriate elements in each returned Instance. If false, no CLASSORIGIN attributes are present in each returned Instance.

If the PropertyList input parameter is not NULL, the members of the array define one or more Property names.  Each returned Instance MUST NOT include elements for any Properties missing from this list.  Note that if LocalOnly is specified as true (or DeepInheritance is specified as false) this acts as an additional filter on the set of Properties returned (for example, if Property A is included in the PropertyList but LocalOnly is set to true and A is not local to a returned Instance, then it will not be included in that Instance). If the PropertyList input parameter is an empty array this signifies that no Properties are included in each returned Instance. If the PropertyList input parameter is NULL this specifies that all Properties (subject to the conditions expressed by the other parameters) are included in each returned Instance.

If the PropertyList contains duplicate elements, the Server MUST ignore the duplicates but otherwise process the request normally.  If the PropertyList contains elements which are invalid Property names for any target Instance, the Server MUST ignore such entries but otherwise process the request normally.

If successful, the method returns zero or more named Instances that meet the required criteria.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.12. EnumerateInstanceNames

This operation is used to enumerate the names (model paths) of the instances of a CIM Class in the target Namespace.

 EnumerateInstanceNames
 <instanceName>* EnumerateInstanceNames (
         [IN] <className> ClassName
 )

The ClassName input parameter defines the Class that is the basis for the enumeration. 

If successful, the method returns zero or more names of Instances (model paths) that meet the requsted criteria.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.13. ExecQuery

This operation is used to execute a query against the target Namespace.

 ExecQuery
 <object>* ExecQuery (
         [IN] string QueryLanguage,
         [IN] string Query
 )

The QueryLanguage input parameter defines the query language in which the Query parameter is expressed.

The Query input parameter defines the query to be executed.

Neither the Query language nor the format of the Query are defined by this specification.  It is anticipated that Query languages will be submitted to the DMTF as separate proposals.

A mechanism whereby CIM Servers can declare which query languages they support (if any) is defined in Determining CIM Server Capabilities.

If successful, the method returns zero or more CIM Classes or Instances that correspond to the results set of the query.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.14. Associators

This operation is used to enumerate CIM Objects (Classes or Instances) that are associated to a particular source CIM Object.

 Associators
 <objectWithPath>* Associators (
         [IN] <objectName> ObjectName,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <className> AssocClass = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <className> ResultClass = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string Role = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string ResultRole = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeQualifiers = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeClassOrigin = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string PropertyList [] = NULL
 )

The ObjectName input parameter defines the source CIM Object whose associated Objects are to be returned.  This may be either a Class name or Instance name (model path).

The AssocClass input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid CIM Association Class name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of Objects by mandating that each returned Object MUST be associated to the source Object via an Instance of this Class or one of its subclasses.

The ResultClass input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid CIM Class name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of Objects by mandating that each returned Object MUST be either an Instance of this Class (or one of its subclasses) or be this Class (or one of its subclasses).

The Role input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid Property name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of Objects by mandating that each returned Object MUST be associated to the source Object via an Association in which the source Object plays the specified role (i.e. the name of the Property in the Association Class that refers to the source Object MUST match the value of this parameter).

The ResultRole input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid Property name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of Objects by mandating that each returned Object MUST be associated to the source Object via an Association in which the returned Object plays the specified role (i.e. the name of the Property in the Association Class that refers to the returned Object MUST match the value of this parameter).

If the IncludeQualifiers input parameter is true, this specifies that all Qualifiers for each Object (including Qualifiers on the Object and on any returned Properties) MUST be included as <QUALIFIER> elements in the response.  If false no <QUALIFIER> elements are present in each returned Object.

If the IncludeClassOrigin input parameter is true, this specifies that the CLASSORIGIN attribute MUST be present on all appropriate elements in each returned Object. If false, no CLASSORIGIN attributes are present in each returned Object.

If the PropertyList input parameter is not NULL, the members of the array define one or more Property names.  Each returned Object MUST NOT include elements for any Properties missing from this list.  Note that if LocalOnly is specified as true (or DeepInheritance is specified as false) this acts as an additional filter on the set of Properties returned (for example, if Property A is included in the PropertyList but LocalOnly is set to true and A is not local to a returned Instance, then it will not be included in that Instance). If the PropertyList input parameter is an empty array this signifies that no Properties are included in each returned Object. If the PropertyList input parameter is NULL this specifies that all Properties (subject to the conditions expressed by the other parameters) are included in each returned Object.

If the PropertyList contains duplicate elements, the Server MUST ignore the duplicates but otherwise process the request normally.  If the PropertyList contains elements which are invalid Property names for any target Object, the Server MUST ignore such entries but otherwise process the request normally.

Clients SHOULD NOT explicitly specify properties in the PropertyList parameter unless they have specified a non-NULL value for the ResultClass parameter.

If successful, the method returns zero or more CIM Classes or Instances meeting the requested criteria.  Since it is possible for CIM Objects from different hosts or namespaces to be associated, each returned Object includes location information.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.15. AssociatorNames

This operation is used to enumerate the names of CIM Objects (Classes or Instances) that are associated to a particular source CIM Object.

 AssociatorNames
 <objectPath>* AssociatorNames (
         [IN] <objectName> ObjectName,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <className> AssocClass = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <className> ResultClass = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string Role = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string ResultRole = NULL
 )

The ObjectName input parameter defines the source CIM Object whose associated names are to be returned. This is either a Class name or Instance name (model path).

The AssocClass input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid CIM Association Class name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of names by mandating that each returned name identifies an Object that MUST be associated to the source Object via an Instance of this Class or one of its subclasses.

The ResultClass input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid CIM Class name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of names by mandating that each returned name identifies an Object that MUST be either an Instance of this Class (or one of its subclasses) or be this Class (or one of its subclasses).

The Role input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid Property name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of names by mandating that each returned name identifies an Object that MUST be associated to the source Object via an Association in which the source Object plays the specified role (i.e. the name of the Property in the Association Class that refers to the source Object MUST match the value of this parameter).

The ResultRole input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid Property name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of names by mandating that each returned name identifies an Object that MUST be associated to the source Object via an Association in which the named returned Object plays the specified role (i.e. the name of the Property in the Association Class that refers to the returned Object MUST match the value of this parameter).

If successful, the method returns zero or more full CIM Class paths or Instance paths of Objects meeting the requested criteria.  Since it is possible for CIM Objects from different hosts or namespaces to be associated, each returned path is an absolute path that includes host and namespace information.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.16. References

This operation is used to enumerate the association objects that refer to a particular target CIM Object (Class or Instance).

 References
 <objectWithPath>* References (
         [IN] <objectName> ObjectName,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <className> ResultClass = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string Role = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeQualifiers = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL] boolean IncludeClassOrigin = false,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string PropertyList [] = NULL
 )

The ObjectName input parameter defines the target CIM Object whose referring Objects are to be returned. This is either a Class name or Instance name (model path). 

The ResultClass input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid CIM Class name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of Objects by mandating that each returned Object MUST be an Instance of this Class (or one of its subclasses), or this Class (or one of its subclasses).

The Role input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid Property name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of Objects by mandating that each returned Objects MUST refer to the target Object via a Property whose name matches the value of this parameter.

If the IncludeQualifiers input parameter is true, this specifies that all Qualifiers for each Object (including Qualifiers on the Object and on any returned Properties) MUST be included as <QUALIFIER> elements in the response.  If false no <QUALIFIER> elements are present in each returned Object.

If the IncludeClassOrigin input parameter is true, this specifies that the CLASSORIGIN attribute MUST be present on all appropriate elements in each returned Object. If false, no CLASSORIGIN attributes are present in each returned Object.

If the PropertyList input parameter is not NULL, the members of the array define one or more Property names.  Each returned Object MUST NOT include elements for any Properties missing from this list.  Note that if LocalOnly is specified as true (or DeepInheritance is specified as false) this acts as an additional filter on the set of Properties returned (for example, if Property A is included in the PropertyList but LocalOnly is set to true and A is not local to a returned Instance, then it will not be included in that Instance). If the PropertyList input parameter is an empty array this signifies that no Properties are included in each returned Object. If the PropertyList input parameter is NULL this specifies that all Properties (subject to the conditions expressed by the other parameters) are included in each returned Object.

If the PropertyList contains duplicate elements, the Server MUST ignore the duplicates but otherwise process the request normally.  If the PropertyList contains elements which are invalid Property names for any target Object, the Server MUST ignore such entries but otherwise process the request normally.

Clients SHOULD NOT explicitly specify properties in the PropertyList parameter unless they have specified a non-NULL value for the ResultClass parameter.

If successful, the method returns zero or more CIM Classes or Instances meeting the requested criteria.  Since it is possible for CIM Objects from different hosts or namespaces to be associated, each returned Object includes location information.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.17. ReferenceNames

This operation is used to enumerate the association objects that refer to a particular target CIM Object (Class or Instance).

 ReferenceNames
 <objectPath>* ReferenceNames (
         [IN] <objectName> ObjectName,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <className> ResultClass = NULL,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] string Role = NULL
 )

The ObjectName input parameter defines the target CIM Object whose referring object names are to be returned. It may be either a Class name or an Instance name (model path).

The ResultClass input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid CIM Class name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of Object Names by mandating that each returned Object Name MUST identify an Instance of this Class (or one of its subclasses), or this Class (or one of its subclasses).

The Role input parameter, if not NULL, MUST be a valid Property name. It acts as a filter on the returned set of Object Names by mandating that each returned Object Name MUST identify an Object that refers to the target Instance via a Property whose name matches the value of this parameter.

If successful, the method returns the names of zero or more full CIM Class paths or Instance paths of Objects meeting the requested criteria.  Since it is possible for CIM Objects from different hosts or namespaces to be associated, each returned path is an absolute path that includes host and namespace information.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.18. GetProperty

This operation is used to retrieve a single property value from a CIM Instance in the target Namespace.

 GetProperty
 <propertyValue>? GetProperty (
         [IN] <instanceName> InstanceName,
         [IN] string PropertyName
 )

The InstanceName input parameter specifies the name of the Instance (model path) from which the Property value is requested.

The PropertyName input parameter specifies the name of the Property whose value is to be returned.

If successful, the return value specifies the value of the requested Property. If the value is NULL then no element is returned.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.19. SetProperty

This operation is used to set a single property value in a CIM Instance in the target Namespace.

 SetProperty
 void SetProperty (
         [IN] <instanceName> InstanceName,
         [IN] string PropertyName,
         [IN,OPTIONAL,NULL] <propertyValue> NewValue = NULL
 )

The InstanceName input parameter specifies the name of the Instance (model path) for which the Property value is to be updated.

The PropertyName input parameter specifies the name of the Property whose value is to be updated.

The NewValue input parameter specifies the new value for the Property (which may be NULL).

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.20. GetQualifier

This operation is used to retrieve a single Qualifier declaration from the target Namespace. 

 GetQualifier
 <qualifierDecl> GetQualifier (
         [IN] string QualifierName
 )

The QualifierName input parameter identifies the Qualifier whose declaration to be retrieved.

If successful, the method returns the Qualifier declaration for the named Qualifier.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.21. SetQualifier

This operation is used to create or update a single Qualifier declaration in the target Namespace.  If the Qualifier declaration already exists it is overwritten.

 SetQualifier
 void SetQualifier (
         [IN] <qualifierDecl> QualifierDeclaration
 )

The QualifierDeclaration input parameter defines the Qualifier Declaration to be added to the Namespace.

If successful, the Qualifier declaration MUST have been added to the target Namespace.  If a Qualifier declaration with the same Qualifier name already existed, then it MUST have been replaced by the new declaration.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.22. DeleteQualifier

This operation is used to delete a single Qualifier declaration from the target Namespace. 

 DeleteQualifier
 void DeleteQualifier (
         [IN] string QualifierName
 )

The QualifierName input parameter identifies the Qualifier whose declaration to be deleted.

If successful, the specified Qualifier declaration MUST have been deleted from the Namespace.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.4.23. EnumerateQualifiers

This operation is used to enumerate Qualifier declarations from the target Namespace. 

 EnumerateQualifiers
 <qualifierDecl>* EnumerateQualifiers (
 )

If successful, the method returns zero or more Qualifier declarations.

If unsuccessful, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by this method, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional method-specific interpretation of the error in is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

2.5. Namespace Manipulation

There are no intrinsic methods defined specifically for the purpose of manipulating CIM Namespaces. However, the modelling of a CIM Namespace using the class __Namespace, together with the requirement that the root Namespace MUST be supported by all CIM Servers, implies that all Namespace operations can be supported.

For example:

2.6. Functional Profiles

This section partitions the intrinsic methods into functional groups for the purpose of establishing conformance.

Support for a particular group does not guarantee that all invocations of any method in that group will succeed.  Rather, the exclusion of a group is a declaration that any attempt to call a method in that group will always return CIM_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED.

Mechanisms by which a CIM Server may declare the functional groups that it supports are defined in the section on Determining CIM Server Capabilities.

In order to limit the number of different profiles that may be supported by a CIM Server, each functional group has a dependency on another group (with the exception of the Basic Read functional group).  If functional group G1 has a dependency on functional group G2, then a CIM Server which supports G1 MUST also support G2

The dependency relation is transitive, so that if G1 depends on G2, and G2 depends on G3, then G1 depends on G3. It is also anti-symmetric, so that if G1 depends on G2 then G2 cannot depend on G1.

Using these rules, the table below defines a rooted directed tree of dependencies with the Basic Read dependency representing the root node. 

For example, a CIM Server which supports the Schema Manipulation functional group MUST also support the Instance Manipulation, Basic Write and Basic Read.

Functional Group

Dependency

Methods

Basic Read none GetClass
EnumerateClasses
EnumerateClassNames
GetInstance
EnumerateInstances
EnumerateInstanceNames
GetProperty
Basic Write Basic Read SetProperty
Schema Manipulation Instance Manipulation CreateClass
ModifyClass
DeleteClass
Instance Manipulation Basic Write CreateInstance
ModifyInstance
DeleteInstance
Association Traversal Basic Read Associators
AssociatorNames
References
ReferenceNames
Query Execution Basic Read ExecQuery
Qualifier Declaration Schema Manipulation GetQualifier
SetQualifier
DeleteQualifier
EnumerateQualifiers

Back to contents

2.7. Extrinsic Method Invocation

Any CIM Server is assumed to support extrinsic methods. Extrinsic methods are defined by the Schema supported by the Cim Server. If a Cim Server does not support extrinsic method invocations, it MUST (subject to the considerations described in the rest of this section) return the error code CIM_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED to any request to execute an extrinsic method. This allows a CIM client to determine that all attempts to execute extrinsic methods will fail.

If the Cim Server is unable to perform the extrinsic method invocation, one of the following status codes MUST be returned by the CimServer, where the first applicable error in the list (starting with the first element of the list, and working down) is the error returned. Any additional specific interpretation of the error is given in parentheses.

Back to contents

3. Encapsulation of CIM Operations

All CIM Operation requests MUST be made using either an HTTP M-POST or POST message, with the preferred mechanism being the use of M-POST. The use of other HTTP Methods to invoke CIM Operations is outside the scope of this specification.

All CIM Operation responses are carried in the corresponding HTTP Response message to the M-POST or POST request.

In the remainder of this document:

Where it is necessary to distinguish requirements between the use of M-POST and POST, these will be explicitly defined.

The extension mechanism used in this document is based on the HTTP Extension Framework [9]. A goal of the framework is to allow a decentralized naming mechanism whereby parties can introduce additional HTTP Headers without fear of conflicting interpretation of a given Header name.

It is not the intention of this document to replicate information in that document concerning the required behavior of entities that implement this framework; suffice it to say that conforming CIM implementations of this specification protocol MUST abide by all requirements in that document.

Back to contents

3.1. CIM Clients and Servers

The following definitions are used throughout the remainder of this document:

An HTTP client/server MAY be capable of acting as both a CIM client and a CIM server.

Back to contents

3.2. Use of M-POST and POST

A CIM client attempting a CIM Operation invocation conformant to this specification MUST first try the invocation using the HTTP method "M-POST".

This extended invocation mechanism allows Internet proxies & firewalls greater filtering control and administrative flexibility over CIM Operation invocations.

In the case of a client receiving a 501 or 510 status in response to an M-POST request, then in subsequent invocations to the same HTTP server, the client MAY omit the attempt at M-POST invocations for a suitable period, thus avoiding the need for an extra round trip on each and every method invocation.  The details of the caching strategy employed by the client are outside of the scope of this specification.

Given this algorithm, firewalls can if they wish effectively force the use of M-POST for CIM Operation invocations by prohibiting POST invocations containing the Extension Header CIMOperation.

3.2.1. Use of the Ext Header

If a CIM Server receives a valid M-POST request, and has fulfilled all mandatory extension header declarations in the request, then it MUST include in the response the "Ext" header defined by [9].  This must be protected by the appropriate Cache-Control directive.

Back to contents

3.3. Extension Headers Defined for CIM Operation Requests and Responses

This section describes the extension headers used to specify CIM operational semantics in the HTTP Header of an M-POST or POST message.

Any CIM Operation Request or CIM Operation Response MUST include the following CIM extension header:

Any CIM Operation Request MUST include one and only one of the following CIM extension header sets:

An HTTP reponse with an error status code to a CIM Operation Request MAY include the following CIM extension header:

All CIM Operation Requests and Responses MAY include the following CIM extension header:

Back to contents

3.3.1. Naming of Extension Headers

In M-POST request messages (and their responses), CIM extension headers MUST be declared using the name space prefix allotted by the "Man" extension header (in accordance with [9]) that refers to the name space "http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0".

The full format of the "Man" header declaration for this specification is:

Man              = "Man" ":" "http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0"
                   ";" "ns" "=" header-prefix
header-prefix    = 2*DIGIT

This header-prefix SHOULD be generated at random on a per-HTTP message basis, and SHOULD NOT necessarily be a specific number.

In accordance with [9], all POST request messages (and their responses) MUST NOT include such a mandatory extension declaration. In POST request messages (and their responses), name space prefixes MUST NOT be used.

Example 1

Using M-POST:

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
Man: http://www.dmtf.org./cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=23
23-CIMOperation: MethodCall
...

Example 2

Using POST:

POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
CIMOperation: MethodCall
...

Back to contents

3.3.2. Encoding of CIM Element Names within HTTP Headers

CIM element (class, property, qualifier, method or method parameter) names are natively Unicode, and may use UCS-2 characters unsuitable for inclusion within an HTTP message header. In order to encode CIM element names represented in Unicode to values within HTTP Headers, the following mapping MUST be used:

The token CIMIdentifier, where used in this document, represents a CIM element name to which this transformation has been applied.

One characteristic of this mapping is that CIM elements that are named with an ASCII representation will appear in ASCII in the resultant URL.

Examples

CIM_LogicalElement is unchanged under this transformation

The class named using the UCS-2 sequence representing the Hangul characters for the Korean word "hangugo" (D55C, AD6D, C5B4) becomes

      %ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%96%B4=10

after UTF-8 transformation and escaping all characters with their % HEX HEX equivalent.

Back to contents

3.3.3. Encoding of CIM Object Paths within HTTP Headers

This section describes the mapping that MUST be applied in order to represent CIM object paths, as described within an Operation Request Message using the <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>, <LOCALCLASSPATH> or <LOCALINSTANCEPATH> elements, in a format that is safe for representation within an HTTP header.

If the element to be transformed is a <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH> element, the algorithm is as follows:

  1. For the first NAMESPACE subelement, output the textual content of that element.
  2. For each subsequent NAMESPACE subelement, output the forward slash character (/) followed by the textual content of that NAMESPACE element.

If the element to be transformed is a <LOCALCLASSPATH> element, the algorithm is as follows:

  1. Transform the <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH> subelement using the rules described above, and output a colon character (:).
  2. Output the value of the NAME attribute of the <CLASSNAME> subelement.

If the element to be transformed is an <LOCALINSTANCEPATH> element, the algorithm is as follows:

  1. Transform the <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH> subelement using the rules described above, and output a colon character (:).
  2. Output the value of the CLASSNAME attribute of the <INSTANCENAME> subelement.
  3. If there is at least one <KEYBINDING> subelement under the <INSTANCENAME> subelement, then for each such subelement:
  4. If there is no <KEYBINDING> subelement but there is a <KEYVALUE> or <VALUE.REFERENCE> subelement under the <INSTANCENAME> subelement, then:
  5. If there were no <KEYBINDING> subelements, or no <KEYVALUE> or <VALUE.REFERENCE> subelement, under the <INSTANCENAME> subelement then output the string "=@" to indicate a singleton instance.

Finally, after applying the above rules to the <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>, <LOCALCLASSPATH> or <LOCALINSTANCEPATH> element, transform the entire output string into URI-safe format as follows: 

  1. Encode the string using UTF-8 [15] if it is not already in this format, and then;
  2. Apply the standard URI [16, section 2] escaping mechanism to the resulting string to escape any characters that are unsafe within an HTTP Header, using the ""%" HEX HEX" convention).

The token CIMObjectPath, where used in this document, represents a <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>, <LOCALCLASSPATH> or <LOCALINSTANCEPATH> element to which the above transformation has been applied.

Back to contents

3.3.4. CIMOperation

This header MUST be present in all CIM Operation Request and CIM Operation Response messages.  It identifies the HTTP message as carrying a CIM Operation request or response.

CIMOperation = "CIMOperation" ":" ("MethodCall" | "MethodResponse")

A CIM Client MUST include this header, with the value "MethodCall", in all CIM Operation Requests that it issues.  A CIM Server MUST include this header in all CIM Operation Responses, with the value "MethodResponse", that it issues.

If a CIM Server receives CIM Operation request with this header, but with a missing value or a value that is not "MethodCall", then it MUST fail the request with status "400 Bad Request". The CIM Server MUST include a CIMError header in the response with a value of unsupported-operation.

If a CIM Server receives a CIM Operation request without this header, it MUST NOT process it as if it were a CIM Operation Request.  The status code returned by the CIM Server in response to such a request is outside of the scope of this specification.

If a CIM Client receives a response to a CIM Operation Request without this header (or if this header has a value which is not "MethodResponse"), it SHOULD discard the response, and take appropriate measures to publicize the fact that it has received an incorrect response.  The details as to how this is done are outside of the scope of this specification.

This header affords a simple mechanism by which firewall or proxy administrators can make global administrative decisions on all CIM Operations.

Back to contents

3.3.5. CIMProtocolVersion

This header MAY be present in any CIM Operation Request or CIM Operation Response message.  The header identifies the version of the CIM mapping onto HTTP being used by the sending entity.

CIMProtocolVersion = "CIMProtocolVersion" ":" 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT

If the header is omitted, then a value of 1.0 MUST be assummed.

The major and minor numbers MUST be treated as independent integers which MAY be incremented higher than a single digit.  Therefore version x1.y1 is lower than x2.y2 if and only if:

If a CIM Server receives an CIM Operation Request for which the value of this header indicates a version that it does not support, then it MUST respond in the manner defined in the section on Errors.

Otherwise, if a CIM Server receives an CIM Operation Request for which the value of this header does not match the value of the PROTOCOLVERSION attribute of the <MESSAGE> element within the Operation Request, then it MUST fail the request and return a status of "400 Bad Request" (and MUST include a CIMError header in the response with a value of unsupported-protocol-version), subject to the considerations specified in Errors.

Back to contents

3.3.6. CIMMethod

This header MUST be present in any CIM Operation Request message that contains a Simple Operation Request

It MUST NOT be present in any CIM Operation Response message, nor in any CIM Operation Request message that is not a Simple Operation Request.

The header identifies the name of the CIM method to be invoked, encoded in an HTTP-safe representation.  Firewalls and proxies may use this header to carry out routing and forwarding decisions based on the CIM method to be invoked.

The name of the CIM method within a Simple Operation Request is defined to be the value of the NAME attribute of the <METHODCALL> or <IMETHODCALL> element.

CIMMethod  = "CIMMethod" ":" MethodName
MethodName = CIMIdentifier

If a CIM Server receives a CIM Operation Request for which either:

then it MUST fail the request and return a status of "400 Bad Request" (and MUST include a CIMError header in the response with a value of header-mismatch), subject to the considerations specified in Errors.

Note that this verification provides a basic level of assurance that any intermediate firewall or proxy was not acting on misleading information when it decided to forward the request based on the content of the CIMMethod header.  Additional securing of HTTP messages against modification in transit (such as the encryption of the payload or appending of a digital signature thereto) would be required to provide a higher degree of integrity.

Back to contents

3.3.7. CIMObject

This header MUST be present in any CIM Operation Request message that contains a Simple Operation Request

It MUST NOT be present in any CIM Operation Response message, nor in any CIM Operation Request message that that is not a Simple Operation Request.

The header identifies the CIM object (which MUST be a Class or Instance for an extrinsic method, or a Namespace for an intrinsic method) on which the method is to be invoked, using a CIM object path encoded in an HTTP-safe representation.  Firewalls and proxies may use this header to carry out routing and forwarding decisions based on the CIM object that is the target of a method invocation.

CIMObject  = "CIMObject" ":" ObjectPath
ObjectPath = CIMObjectPath

The ObjectPath value is constructed by applying the algorithm defined in Encoding CIM Object Paths to either:

within the CIM Operation Request.

If a CIM Server receives a CIM Operation Request for which either:

then it MUST fail the request and return a status of "400 Bad Request" (and MUST include a CIMError header in the response with a value of header-mismatch), subject to the considerations specified in Errors.

Note that this verification provides a basic level of assurance that any intermediate firewall or proxy was not acting on misleading information when it decided to forward the request based on the content of the CIMObject header.  Additional securing of HTTP messages against modification in transit (such as the encryption of the payload or appending of a digital signature thereto) would be required to provide a higher degree of integrity.

Back to contents

3.3.8. CIMBatch

This header MUST be present in any CIM Operation Request message that contains a Multiple Operation Request

It MUST NOT be present in any CIM Operation Response message, nor in any CIM Operation Request message that is not a Multiple Operation Request.

The header identifies the encapsulated Operation Request Message as containing multiple method invocations.  Firewalls and proxies may use this header to carry out routing and forwarding decisions for batched CIM method invocations.

CIMBatch = "CIMBatch"

If a CIM Server receives a CIM Operation Request for which either:

then it MUST fail the request and return a status of "400 Bad Request" (and MUST include a CIMError header in the response with a value of header-mismatch), subject to the considerations specified in Errors.

Note that this verification provides a basic level of assurance that any intermediate firewall or proxy was not acting on misleading information when it decided to forward the request based on the content of the CIMBatch header.  Additional securing of HTTP messages against modification in transit (such as the encryption of the payload or appending of a digital signature thereto) would be required to provide a higher degree of integrity.

If a CIM Server receives a CIM Operation Request for which the CIMBatch header is present, but the Server does not support Multiple Operations, then it MUST fail the request and return a status of "501 Not Implemented".  Firewalls or Proxies MAY also employ this mechanism to compel a CIM Client to use Simple Operation Requests rather than Multiple Operation Requests.

A CIM Client that receives a response of "501 Not Implemented" to a Multiple Operation Request SHOULD resubmit that request as a series of Simple Operation Requests. 

Back to contents

3.3.9. CIMError

This header MAY be present in any HTTP response to a CIM Operation Request message that is not a CIM Operation Response

It MUST NOT be present in any CIM Operation Response message, nor in any CIM Operation Request.

The header provides further CIM specific diagnostic information in the case that the CIM Server encountered a fundamental error during processing of the CIM Operation Request, and is intended to assist Clients to further disambiguate errors that have the same HTTP status code.

CIMError  = "CIMError" ":" cim-error

cim-error = "unsupported-protocol-version" |
            "multiple-requests-unsupported" |
            "unsupported-cim-version" |
            "unsupported-dtd-version" |
            "request-not-valid" |
            "request-not-well-formed" |
            "request-not-loosely-valid" |
            "header-mismatch" |
            "unsupported-operation"

Back to contents

4. HTTP Requirements & Usage

4.1. HTTP Support

It is RECOMMENDED that CIM clients and CIM servers support HTTP/1.1 [7].  CIM clients and servers MAY support HTTP/1.0 instead.  CIM clients and servers MUST NOT be limited to any version of HTTP earlier than 1.0.

It should be noted that the current revised draft [10] of RFC 2068 clarifies and corrects ambiguities and errors in that RFC. 

CIM Clients and Servers that make use of extension headers as defined in this specification MUST conform to the requirements defined in [9] for their use.

Back to contents

4.2. Use of Standard Headers

Unless otherwise stated herein, CIM clients and CIM servers MUST comply with the requirements on the use of headers described in [6,7]. This section defines only any additional requirements on CIM clients and servers with respect to the use of standard HTTP headers [6,7] within a CIM Operation Request or CIM Operation Response

Note that headers defined in RFC 2068 [7] but deprecated from [10] (e.g. Public, Content-Base) SHOULD NOT be used by CIM clients and servers.

4.2.1. Accept

If a CIM client includes an Accept header in a request, it MUST specify a value which allows the Server to return an entity body of "text/xml" or "application/xml" in the response.

A CIM server MUST accept any value for this header which states that "text/xml" or "application/xml" is an acceptable type for an response entity.  A server SHOULD return "406 Not Acceptable" if the Accept header indicates that neither of these content types are acceptable.

If a CIM server decides to accept a request to return an entity of type other than "text/xml" or "application/xml", the nature of the response is outside of the domain of this specification.

Back to contents

4.2.2. Accept-Charset

If a CIM client includes an Accept-Charset header in a request, it MUST specify a value which allows the Server to return an entity body using the character set "utf-8".

A CIM server MUST accept any value for this header which implies that "utf-8" is an acceptable character set for an response entity.  A server SHOULD return "406 Not Acceptable" if the Accept-Charset header indicates that this character set is not acceptable.

If a CIM server decides to accept a request to return an entity using a character set other than "utf-8", the nature of the response is outside of the domain of this specification.

See Internationalization Considerations for more details.

Back to contents

4.2.3. Accept-Encoding

If a CIM client includes an Accept-Encoding header in a request, it MUST specify a value which allows the Server to use the "identity" encoding.

A CIM Server MUST accept any value for this header which implies that "identity" is an acceptable encoding for the response entity.  A server MAY return "406 Not Acceptable" if the Accept-Encoding header indicates that the this encoding is not acceptable.

Back to contents

4.2.4. Accept-Language

If a CIM Client includes an Accept-Language header in a request, it SHOULD specify a value which allows the Server to return an entity in the language of its' own choosing.   This is accomplished by including in the list of acceptable language ranges the special range "*".

CIM Servers MAY support multiple languages if they so choose.

See Internationalization Considerations for more details.

Back to contents

4.2.5. Accept-Ranges

CIM clients MUST NOT include this header in a request.  A CIM Server MUST reject a request that includes an Accept-Range header with a status of "406 Not Acceptable".

Back to contents

4.2.6. Allow

If a CIM Server is returning a "405 Method Not Allowed" response to a CIM Operations Request then the Allow header MUST include either M-POST or POST.  Whether it includes any other HTTP methods is outside the scope of this specification.

Back to contents

4.2.7. Authorization

See the section on Security Considerations for more details. 

Back to contents

4.2.8. Cache-Control

In general a CIM Operation Request may consist of a mixture of CIM method invocations, some of which may be eminently cachable (e.g. the Manufacturer label on a Disk Drive), and some of which may be decidedly uncachable (e.g. format a Disk Drive). 

Furthermore, the encapsulation of such multiple method invocations within an HTTP POST or M-POST means that if a CIM Operation Request has any effect on an HTTP cache it is likely to be one of invalidating cached responses for the target CIM Server.  Indeed HTTP/1.1[7] stipulates that by default POST responses are not cachable unless the server indicates otherwise using an appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header.

For these reasons, CIM Operation Responses SHOULD NOT be considered cachable.  A CIM Server SHOULD NOT include a Cache-Control header in a CIM Operation Response which might indicate to a cache that the response could be cached. 

If the CIM Server is responding to a CIM Operation Request coveyed within an M-POST request, then in accordance with [9] the Server MUST include a no-cache control directive to prevent inadvertant caching of the "Ext" header. For example:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
...

Back to contents

4.2.9. Connection

It is RECOMMENDED that

Timeout mechanisms SHOULD be employed to remove idle connections on both client and server, the details of which are outside the domain of this specification. Clients SHOULD be cautious in retrying requests, especially if they are not idempotent (e.g. method invocation).

CIM clients and servers SHOULD support pipelining [7, section 1.1.2.2] if possible, but be aware of the requirements defined in [7].  In particular, attention is drawn to the following requirement from [7]:

Clients SHOULD NOT pipeline requests using non-idempotent methods or non-idempotent sequences of methods...A client wishing to send a non-idempotent request SHOULD wait to send that request until it has received the response status for the previous request.

Back to contents

4.2.10. Content-Encoding

If a CIM client includes a Content-Encoding header in a request, it SHOULD specify a value of "identity", unless it has good reason to believe that the Server can accept another encoding.

Back to contents

4.2.11. Content-Language

See Internationalization Considerations for more details.

Back to contents

4.2.12. Content-Range

CIM clients and CIM servers MUST NOT use this header.

Back to contents

4.2.13. Content-Type

CIM clients and CIM servers MUST specify (and accept) a value for this header of either "text/xml" or "application/xml" as defined in [18]. 

Back to contents

4.2.14. Expires

For the same reasons described in Cache-Control, a CIM Server SHOULD NOT include an Expires header in a CIM Operation Response which might indicate to a cache that the response could be cached.

Back to contents

4.2.15. If-Range

CIM clients and CIM servers MUST NOT use this header.

Back to contents

4.2.16. Proxy-Authenticate

See the section on Security Considerations for more details. 

Back to contents

4.2.17. Range

CIM clients and CIM servers MUST NOT use this header.

Back to contents

4.2.18. WWW-Authenticate

See the section on Security Considerations for more details. 

Back to contents

4.3. Errors and Status Codes

This section defines how CIM Servers MUST handle errors that occur in the processing of a CIM Operation Request. This specification does not introduce any new HTTP response status codes.

If there is an error in processing the HTTP Request-Line or standard HTTP Headers then the CIM Server MUST take the appropriate action as dictated by its conformance to the relevant version of HTTP [6,7].

Otherwise, if there are any mandatory extension declarations which the server does not support it MUST respond with a "510 Not Extended" status according to [9].

Otherwise, the Server MUST process the request in accordance with the relevant version of HTTP [6,7] and the additional rules defined in this document.

Assuming that the HTTP request is otherwise correct, the CIM Server MUST use the following status codes when processing the CIM Extension Headers:

501 Not Implemented One of the following occured:

401 Unauthorized The CIM Server is configured to require that a client authenticate itself before it can issue CIM Operation Requests to the Server.

403 Forbidden The CIM Server does not allow the client to perform CIM Operations.  The CIM Server MAY alternatively respond with a "404 Not Found" if it does not wish to reveal this information to the client.

407 Proxy Authentication Required The CIM Server is configured to require that the proxy authenticate itself before it can issue CIM Operation Requests on behalf of a CIM Client to the Server.

Assuming that the CIM Extension Headers are correct, then a validating CIM Server (one which is enforcing validity of the Operation Request Message with respect to the CIM XML DTD) MUST use the following status code when processing the entity body containing the CIM Operation request.

400 Bad Request The entity body defining the CIM Operation request was not well-formed or not valid with respect to the CIM XML DTD. The CIM Server MUST include a CIMError header in the response with a value of request-not-well-formed or request-not-valid (as appropriate).

A loosely-validating CIM Server (one that is only enforcing that the CIM Operation Request be loosely valid) MAY reject an Operation Request Message that is not loosely valid with an HTTP status code of 400 (Bad Request) before further processing, in which case the CIM Server MUST include a CIMError header in the response with a value of request-not-loosely-valid.

A loosely-validating CIM Server MUST reject an Operation Request Message that is not well-formed with an HTTP status code of 400 (Bad Request), in which case the CIM Server MUST include a CIMError header in the response with a value of request-not-well-formed.

A loosely-validating CIM Server MUST NOT reject an invalid (in the XML sense) Operation Request Message that is loosely valid.

A loosely-validating CIM Server MUST ultimately signal an error to the CIM Client if the Operation Request Message is not loosely valid (i.e. is missing required content, or for which the required content is incorrect, such as an attribute with an invalid value according to the CIM XML DTD).  It is not mandated to reject an Operation Request before processing, for to do otherwise would compel the Server into checking the complete request before processing could begin and this would be as expensive as requiring that the Server fully validate the request. Therefore a loosely-validating Server MAY elect to begin processing the request and issuing a response (with an HTTP success status code) before checking that the entire request is loosely valid.

A CIM Client may determine whether a CIM Server is validating or loosely-validating via the CIMValidation header mechanism.

Assuming that the CIM operation request was correctly formed (in the manner described above), the CIM Server MUST process the request accordingly and return a CIM Operation Response response. 

The entity body MUST be a correct Operation Response Message for that request. 

If the CIM Operation Response contains an entity which is a Simple Operation Response then the response status must be 200 OK.  Otherwise the response status MUST be 207 Multistatus .

Back to contents

4.4. Security Considerations

CIM Clients and CIM Servers MAY elect not to use authentication, but only in environments where lack of security is not an issue.

Basic Authentication is described in [6,7].  Digest Authentication is defined in [12].  Both authentication schemes are covered in a consolidated document [14] which also makes a number of improvements to the original specification of Digest Authentication.

Basic Authentication provides a very rudimentary level of authentication, with the major weakness that the client password is sent over the wire in unencrypted form. 

For this reason CIM Clients and CIM Servers MUST NOT use Basic Authentication other than in the context of a highly secure environment (for example, if used in conjunction with SSL, or in a physically secure private network).  CIM Servers MUST NOT send Basic Authentication credentials in a WWW-Authenticate header other than in the context of a highly secure environment.

Conforming applications SHOULD support the Digest authentication scheme. Since Digest authentication verifies that both parties share a common secret, without having to send that secret in the clear, it is more secure than Basic authentication.  However, CIM Clients and CIM Servers that require more robust protection SHOULD use encyption mechanisms such as SSL or SHTTP.

CIM Clients and CIM Servers using Basic or Digest Authentication MUST comply with the requirements set forth in [6,7,12,14].  This specification describes only additional requirements on CIM Clients and CIM Servers when using these authentication schemes.

CIM Servers SHOULD require that CIM Clients authenticate themselves.  This specification does not mandate this as it is recognized that in some circumstances the CIM Server may not require or wish the overhead of employing authentication.  CIM Servers SHOULD consider carefully the performance/security tradeoffs in determining how often to issue challenges to CIM Clients.

A CIM Server that returns a "401 Unauthorized" response to a CIM Operation Request SHOULD include in the WWW-Authenticate response-header either the "Basic" or "Digest" authentication values (but not both).  This specification does not mandate use of Basic or Digest Authentication as it is recognized that in some circumstances the CIM Server may use bespoke authentication mechanisms not covered by [14].  Similar considerations apply to the use of the Proxy-Authorization header in  "407 Proxy Authentication Required".

Back to contents

4.5. Determining CIM Server Capabilities

The OPTIONS method MAY be used by a client to determine the CIM capabilities (if any) of the target server.  A CIM Server MAY support the OPTIONS method (for example, CIM Servers supporting only HTTP/1.0 would not support OPTIONS).

In order to support the ability for a Server to declare its CIM capabilities in a manner independent of HTTP, it is the intention of the DMTF to publish a CIM Schema (in a separate document) describing such capabilities. In particular this mechanism would allow Servers that do not support the OPTIONS method to declare their capabilities to a Client.

If a CIM Server supports the OPTIONS method, it SHOULD:

In addition, if the CIM Server supports one or more query languages, it SHOULD:

In addition, if the CIM Server runs in a fixed validation mode, it SHOULD:

If the CIMProtocolVersionCIMSupportedFunctionalGroups, CIMSupportsMultipleOperationsCIMValidation or CIMSupportedQueryLanguages extension headers are included in the response, the CIM Server MUST declare them as Optional extension headers using the "Opt" header defined in [9].

The full format of the "Opt" header declaration for this specification is:

Opt              = "Opt" ":" "http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0"
                   ";" "ns" "=" header-prefix
header-prefix    = 2*DIGIT

This header-prefix SHOULD be generated at random on a per-HTTP message basis, and SHOULD NOT necessarily be a specific number.

For example the following is a fragment of a legitimate OPTIONS response from a CIM Server:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Opt: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=77
77-CIMProtocolVersion: 1.0
77-CIMSupportedFunctionalGroups: basic-read
77-CIMBatch
77-CIMSupportedQueryLanguages: wql
...

Back to contents

4.5.1. CIMSupportedFunctionalGroups

The CIMSupportedFunctionalGroups extension header SHOULD be returned by a CIM Server in any OPTIONS response.  It MUST NOT be returned in any other scenario.

This header is defined as follows:

CIMSupportedFunctionalGroups  = "CIMSupportedFunctionalGroups" ":" 1#functional-group

functional-group     = "basic-read" |
                       "basic-write" |
                       "schema-manipulation" |
                       "instance-manipulation" |
                       "qualifier-declaration" |
                       "association-traversal" |
                       "query-execution"

The functional group definitions correspond directly to those listed in Functional Profiles.  All CIM Servers MUST support the basic-read functional group.  All CIM Clients MAY assume that any CIM Server supports the basic-read functional group.

The list of functional groups returned by a CIM Server MUST contain the basic-read group, and MUST NOT contain any duplicates.  CIM Clients MUST ignore any duplicate entries in the functional-group list.

If a functional group is included in the list, then the CIM Client MUST assume that all other groups on which it depends (according to the rules defined in Functional Profiles) are also supported.  A CIM Server SHOULD NOT explicitly include a functional group in the list whose presence may be inferred implicitly by a dependency.

For example the following HTTP response message indicates that the CIM Server supports instance-manipulation, association-traversal, basic-write and basic-read.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Opt: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=77
77-CIMProtocolVersion: 1.0
77-CIMSupportedFunctionalGroups: association-traversal, instance-manipulation
...

Support for a functional group does not imply that any method from that group will always succeed.  Rather, the absence (whether explicit or implied) of the functional group from this header is an indication to the CIM Client that methods in that group will never succeed.

Back to contents

4.5.2. CIMSupportsMultipleOperations

The CIMSupportsMultipleOperations extension header MUST be returned in an OPTIONS response by any CIM Server that supports Multiple Operation Requests.  It MUST NOT be returned in any other circumstances.

This header is defined as follows:

CIMSupportsMultipleOperations  = "CIMSupportsMultipleOperations"

The presence of this header indicates that the Server can accept and process Multiple Operation Requests.  The absence of this header indicates that the Server can only accept and process Simple Operation Requests.

Back to contents

4.5.3. CIMSupportedQueryLanguages

The CIMSupportedQueryLanguages extension header SHOULD be returned by a CIM Server that supports at least one query language in any OPTIONS response.  It MUST NOT be returned in any other scenario.

This header is defined as follows (token has the meaning conferred by [7, section 2.2]:

CIMSupportedQueryLanguages  = "CIMSupportedQueryLanguages" ":" 1#query-language

query-language     = token

The query-language value MUST be treated as case-insensitive. It is anticipated that query languages will be submitted for approval to the DMTF, and each submission will define a value for this token to enable it to be specified in this header.

Back to contents

4.5.4. CIMValidation

The CIMValidation extension header MAY be returned by a CIM Server to provide information concerning the level of validation of CIM Operation Request messages.

This header is defined as follows:

CIMValidation    = "CIMValidation" ":" validation-level
validation-level = "validating" |
                   "loosely-validating"

A validation-level of validating indicates that the CIM Server will always apply strict validation of each CIM Operation Request. A validation-level of loosely-validating indicates that the CIM Server will apply loose validation of each CIM Operation Request.

In the absence of this header, a CIM Client SHOULD assume that the CIM Server operates in strict validation mode.

Back to contents

4.6. Other HTTP Methods

This specification does not in any way define or constrain the manner in which a CIM Client or Server uses any HTTP Method other than those explicitly referred to herein.

Back to contents

4.7. Discovery and Addressing

The target URI of the CIM Operation Request is defined to be the location of the CIM Server.  This specification does not constrain the format of this URI other than it be a valid URI [13] for the purposes of describing an HTTP-addressable resource.

An HTTP Server which supports the CIM Mapping defined herein, and which supports the OPTIONS method, SHOULD include the following CIM extension header in an OPTIONS response:

This header is defined as follows:

CIMOM        = "CIMOM" ":" (absoluteURI | relativeURI)

The terms absoluteURI and relativeURI are taken from [7]; they indicate the location of the CIM Server for this HTTP Server.

If the CIMOM extension header is included in the response, the CIM Server MUST declare it an Optional extension header in an analagous fashion to that described in the section on Determining CIM Server Capabilities.

A CIM Client that wishes to communicate with a CIM Server on an HTTP Server SHOULD try an OPTIONS request to that HTTP Server.  If the OPTIONS request fails, or the response does not include the CIM-CIMOM extension header, then the CIM Client MAY assume that the value of CIM-CIMOM is the relative URI cimom.

Other discovery mechanisms are outside the scope of this version of the specification.

Example 1

This example shows an HTTP Server located at http://www.dmtf.org issuing an OPTIONS response to an HTTP client to indicate that its CIM Server is located at http://www.dmtf.org/access/cimom.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Opt: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=48
48-CIMOM: /access/cimom
...

Example 2

If an HTTP Server located at http://www.dmtf.org responds with a "501 Not Implemented" to an OPTIONS request from a CIM Client, the CIM client may then try to contact the CIM Server at http://www.dmtf.org/cimom.

Back to contents

4.8. Internationalization Considerations

This section defines the capabilities of the CIM HTTP Mapping with respect to IETF policy guidelines on character sets and languages [19].

In this specification, human-readable fields can be found within a response or request entity body.  In all cases, any human-readable content is encoded using XML (which has explicit provisions for character set tagging and encoding) and requires that XML processors read XML elements encoded, at minimum, using the UTF-8 [15] encoding of the ISO 10646 multilingual plane. 

XML examples in this specification demonstrate use of the charset parameter of the Content-Type header, as defined in [10], as well as the XML encoding attribute on the <?xml> processing instruction, which together provide charset identification information for MIME and XML processors. This specification mandates that conforming applications MUST support at least the "utf-8" charset encoding [19] in the Content-Type header, and the "utf-8" value for the XML encoding attribute. 

XML also provides a language tagging capability for specifying the language of the contents of a particular XML element, based on use of IANA registered language tags [20] in the xml:lang attribute of an XML element to identify the language of its content and attributes.  The XML CIM DTD [2,11] does not declare this attribute on any of the XML elements, and therefore conforming applications MUST NOT use this attribute as otherwise the XML document would not be valid with respect to that DTD.

This specification defines a number of names of HTTP headers and their values.  These are constructed using standard encoding practices so as to always have an HTTP-safe ASCII representation.  Since these headers are not in general visible to users they do not need to support encoding in multiple character sets.

The XML DTD for CIM [2,11] introduces a number of XML element names.  Similarly these are not visible to an end user and do not need to support multiple character set encodings.

The CIM model [1] defines the subset of the Unicode character set that can be used to name CIM elements (Classes, Instances, Methods, Properties, Qualifiers and Method Parameters).  In general these appear as the value of XML attributes or as element content, and in general would not be displayed to end users.

Values of CIM Properties and Qualifiers, and error message descriptions MAY be localizable, but there is no mandate on CIM Servers to support this.  Negotiation and notification of language settings is effected in this mapping using the standard Accept-Language and Content-Language headers defined in [7].

5. References

  1. "Common Information Model (CIM) Specification", Version 2.2, DMTF, 14th June 1999 (http://dmtf.org/spec/cim_schema_v22.pdf)
  2. "Specification for the Representation of CIM in XML", Version 2.0, DMTF, 20th July 1999 (http://www.dmtf.org/spec/CIM_XML_Mapping20.htm)
  3. "Extensible Markup Language (XML)", Version 1.0, W3C Recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml)
  4. "Namespaces in XML", 14th January 1999, W3C Recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names)
  5. "XML as a Representation for Management Information - A White Paper", Version 1.0, DMTF, September 15th 1998 (http://www.dmtf.org/spec/xmlw.html)
  6. "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0", IETF RFC 1945, May 1996 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1945.txt)
  7. "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", IETF RFC 2068, January 1997 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2068.txt)
  8. "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", IETF RFC 2119, March 1997 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt)
  9. "HTTP Extension Framework", IETF Internet Draft, March 15th 1999 (http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-frystyk-http-extensions-03.txt)
  10. "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", IETF Internet Draft, 18th November 1998 (http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-06.txt )
  11. "CIM XML DTD", Version 2.0, DMTF, 20th July 1999 ( http://www.dmtf.org/spec/cim_dtd_V20.txt)
  12. "An Extension to HTTP : Digest Access Authentication", IETF RFC 2069, January 1997 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1945.txt)
  13. "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", IETF RFC 2396, 12th August 1998 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt)
  14. "HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication", IETF Internet Draft, September 2nd 1998 (http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-http-authentication-03.txt)
  15. "UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and ISO 10646", RFC 2279, January 1998 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2279.txt)
  16. "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", IETF RFC 2396, 12th August 1998 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt)
  17. "XSL Transformations (XSLT)", Version 1.0, W3C Working Draft, 21st April 1999 (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xslt)
  18. "XML Media Types", IETF Informational RFC 2376, July 1998 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2376.txt)
  19. "IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages", IETF Best Current Practice RFC 2277, January 1998 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2277.txt)
  20. "Tags for the Identification of Languages", IETF Standards Track RFC 1766, March 1995 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1766.txt)
  21. "XML Schema Part 1: Structures", W3C Working Draft 6th May 1999 (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/)

Back to contents

Appendix A - Examples of Message Exchanges

This section illustrates the protocol defined in this document by providing examples of valid HTTP request/response exchanges.

For the purposes of clarity additional white space has been included in the examples, but such white space is not an intrinsic part of such XML documents. 

A.1. Retrieval of a Single Class Definition

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would request the class CIM_VideoBIOSElement.

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: GetClass
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="GetClass">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="cimv20"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="ClassName"><CLASSNAME NAME="CIM_VideoBIOSElement"/></IPARAMVALUE>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="LocalOnly"><VALUE>FALSE</VALUE></IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating success of the requested operation.  For clarity of exposition the complete definition of the returned <CLASS> element has not been shown.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="GetClass">
    <IRETURNVALUE>
      <CLASS NAME="CIM_VideoBIOSElement" SUPERCLASS="CIM_SoftwareElement">
      ...
      </CLASS>
    </IRETURNVALUE>
   </IMETHODRESPONSE>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.2. Retrieval of a Single Instance Definition

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would request the instance MyClass.MyKey="S3".

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: GetInstance
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="1.1">
 <MESSAGE ID="87855" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="GetInstance">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="myNamespace"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="InstanceName">
      <INSTANCENAME CLASSNAME="MyClass">
       <KEYBINDING NAME="MyKey"><KEYVALUE>S3</KEYVALUE></KEYBINDING>
      </INSTANCENAME>
    </IPARAMVALUE>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="LocalOnly"><VALUE>FALSE</VALUE></IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating an error due to the specified instance not being found.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87885" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="GetInstance">
    <ERROR CODE="6" DESCRIPTION="Instance of MyClass not found"/>
   </IMETHODRESPONSE>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.3. Deletion of a Single Class Definition

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would delete the class CIM_VideoBIOSElement.

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: DeleteClass
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="DeleteClass">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="cimv20"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="ClassName"><CLASSNAME NAME="CIM_VideoBIOSElement"/></IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating failure of the above operation due to the inability to delete instances of the Class.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="DeleteClass">
    <ERROR CODE="9" DESCRIPTION="Class has non-deletable instances"/>
   </IMETHODRESPONSE>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.4. Deletion of a Single Instance Definition

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would delete the instance MyClass.MyKey="S3".

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: DeleteInstance
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="DeleteInstance">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="myNamespace"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="InstancePath">
      <INSTANCENAME CLASSNAME="MyClass">
       <KEYBINDING NAME="MyKey">
        <KEYVALUE>S3</KEYVALUE>
       </KEYBINDING>
      </INSTANCENAME>
    </IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating success of the above operation.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/operation ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="DeleteInstance"/>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.5. Creation of a Single Class Definition

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would create the class MySchema_VideoBIOSElement as a subclass of CIM_VideoBIOSElement.  For clarity of exposition most of the submitted <CLASS> element is omitted from the example.

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: CreateClass
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="CreateClass">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="cimv2"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="NewClass">
     <CLASS NAME="MySchema_VideoBIOSElement" SUPERCLASS="CIM_VideoBIOSElement">
      ...
     </CLASS>
    </IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating success of the above operation.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="CreateClass"/>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.6. Creation of a Single Instance Definition

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would create an instance of the class MySchema_VideoBIOSElement. For clarity of exposition most of the submitted <INSTANCE> element is omitted from the example.

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: CreateInstance
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="CreateInstance">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="cimv20"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="NewInstance">
     <INSTANCE CLASSNAME="CIM_VideoBIOSElement">
      ...
     </INSTANCE>
    </IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating success of the above operation.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="CreateInstance">
    <IRETURNVALUE>
     <INSTANCENAME CLASSNAME="MySchema_VideoBIOSElement">
       <KEYBINDING NAME="Name">
        <KEYVALUE>S4</KEYVALUE>
       </KEYBINDING>
     </INSTANCENAME>
    </IRETURNVALUE>
   </IRETURNVALUE>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.7. Enumeration of Class Names

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would enumerate the names of all subclasses of the class CIM_SoftwareElement.

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: EnumerateClassNames
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="EnumerateClassNames">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="cimv20"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="ClassName"><CLASSNAME NAME="CIM_SoftwareElement"/></IPARAMVALUE>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="DeepInheritance"><VALUE>FALSE</VALUE></IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating success of the above operation, and returning the names of the requested subclasses.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="EnumerateClassNames">
    <IRETURNVALUE>
     <CLASSNAME NAME="CIM_BIOSElement"/>
     <CLASSNAME NAME="CIM_VideoBOISElement"/>
    </IRETURNVALUE>
   </IMETHODRESPONSE>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.8. Enumeration of Instances

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would enumerate all instances of the class CIM_LogicalDisk. For clarity of exposition most of the returned Instances are omitted from the example.

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/operation ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: EnumerateInstances
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="EnumerateInstances">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="cimv20"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="ClassName"><CLASSNAME NAME="CIM_LogicalDisk"/></IPARAMVALUE>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="LocalOnly"><VALUE>TRUE</VALUE></IPARAMVALUE>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="DeepInheritance"><VALUE>TRUE</VALUE></IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating success of the above operation, returning the requested instances.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="EnumerateInstances">
    <IRETURNVALUE>
     <VALUE.NAMEDINSTANCE>
      <INSTANCENAME CLASSNAME="Erewhon_LogicalDisk">
       ...
      </INSTANCENAME>
      <INSTANCE CLASSNAME="Erewhon_LogicalDisk">
       ...
      </INSTANCE>
     </VALUE.NAMEDINSTANCE>
     ...
     <VALUE.NAMEDINSTANCE>
      <INSTANCENAME CLASSNAME="Foobar_LogicalDisk">
       ...
      </INSTANCENAME>
      <INSTANCE CLASSNAME="Foobar_LogicalDisk">
       ...
      </INSTANCE>
     </VALUE.NAMEINSTANCE>
    </IRETURNVALUE>
   </IMETHODRESPONSE>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.9. Retrieval of a Single Property

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would retrieve the FreeSpace property from the Instance MyDisk.DeviceID="C:".

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/operation ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: GetProperty
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <IMETHODCALL NAME="GetProperty">
    <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
     <NAMESPACE NAME="myNamespace"/>
    </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="InstanceName">
     <INSTANCENAME CLASSNAME="MyDisk">
      <KEYBINDING NAME="DeviceID"><KEYVALUE>C:</KEYVALUE></KEYBINDING>
     </INSTANCENAME>
    </IPARAMVALUE>
    <IPARAMVALUE NAME="PropertyName"><VALUE>FreeSpace</VALUE></IPARAMVALUE>
   </IMETHODCALL>
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating success of the above operation, returning the requested value.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <IMETHODRESPONSE NAME="GetProperty">
    <IRETURNVALUE>
     <VALUE>6752332</VALUE>
    </IRETURNVALUE>
   </IMETHODRESPONSE>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents

A.10. Execution of an Extrinsic Method

The following HTTP request illustrates how a client would execute the SetPowerState method on the Instance MyDisk.DeviceID="C:".

M-POST /cimom HTTP/1.1
HOST: www.erewhon.com
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodCall
73-CIMMethod: SetPowerState
73-CIMObject: root/cimv2:Win32_LogicalDisk="C:"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLEREQ>
   <METHODCALL NAME="SetPowerState">
    <LOCALINSTANCEPATH>
     <LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
      <NAMESPACE NAME="root"/>
      <NAMESPACE NAME="myNamespace"/>
     </LOCALNAMESPACEPATH>
     <INSTANCENAME CLASSNAME="MyDisk">
      <KEYBINDING NAME="C:"><KEYVALUE>C:</KEYVALUE></KEYBINDING>
     </INSTANCENAME>
    </LOCALINSTANCEPATH>
    <PARAMVALUE NAME="PowerState"><VALUE>1</VALUE></PARAMVALUE>
    <PARAMVALUE NAME="Time"><VALUE>00000001132312.000000:000</VALUE></PARAMVALUE>
   </METHODCALL>  
  </SIMPLEREQ>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

The following is an HTTP response to the above request indicating success of the above operation.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: xxxx
Ext:
Cache-Control: no-cache
Man: http://www.dmtf.org/cim/mapping/http/v1.0 ; ns=73
73-CIMOperation: MethodResponse
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CIM CIMVERSION="2.0" DTDVERSION="2.0">
 <MESSAGE ID="87872" PROTOCOLVERSION="1.0">
  <SIMPLERSP>
   <METHODRESPONSE NAME="SetPowerState">
    <RETURNVALUE>
     <VALUE>0</VALUE>
    </RETURNVALUE>
   </METHODRESPONSE>
  </SIMPLERSP>
 </MESSAGE>
</CIM>

Back to contents